2026.07
Policy Optimization
Is One Layer Enough? Training A Single Transformer Layer Can Match Full-Parameter RL Training
This paper introduces layer contribution to measure how much of full-parameter RL improvement can be recovered by training each transformer layer independently. Across multiple models, RL algorithms, and tasks, it finds that gains consistently concentrate in a few middle layers and that single-layer training can match or surpass full-parameter training.
2026.07
Policy Optimization
Turning Off-Policy Tokens On-Policy: A Plug-in Approach for Improving LLM Alignment
This paper introduces Selective Importance Sampling (SIS), a plug-in correction for off-policy LLM reinforcement learning that uses token-level rejection tests to treat accepted tokens as on-policy while retaining standard importance sampling for rejected tokens. SIS reduces the gap between token- and sequence-level gradient estimators with negligible overhead, improving performance and robustness across dense and MoE models.
2026.07
Policy Optimization
SERPO: Self-Evolving Rubric Policy Optimization for Open-Ended Test-Time Reinforcement Learning
This paper introduces SERPO, a test-time reinforcement learning framework for open-ended generation that co-evolves response evidence, query-specific rubrics, and policy parameters without labeled feedback, external reward models, or stronger judges. Probabilistic criterion scoring turns verdict-token likelihoods into rewards, enabling the actor and its self-generated evaluation criteria to improve in a closed loop.
2026.06
Policy Optimization
Rethinking the Divergence Regularization in LLM RL
This paper proposes Divergence Regularized Policy Optimization (DRPO), replacing DPPO's hard divergence mask with a smooth advantage-weighted quadratic regularizer that preserves its trust-region geometry. DRPO provides bounded continuous gradient weights and corrective signals beyond the trust-region boundary, improving LLM RL training stability and efficiency.
2026.05
Policy Optimization
Constraint-Infused Policy Optimization: Principles and Practices for Harnessing Advanced LLM Reasoning
This paper formulates LLM reinforcement learning as constrained policy optimization, unifying existing algorithms through different constraint choices and exposing the roles of clipping, KL regularization, and trust regions. It derives Constraint-Infused Policy Optimization (CIPO), which improves reasoning performance and training stability across diverse tasks and model families.
2026.03
Policy Optimization
BandPO: Bridging Trust Regions and Ratio Clipping via Probability-Aware Bounds for LLM Reinforcement Learning
BandPO projects trust regions defined by general divergence measures into dynamic, probability-aware clipping intervals, expanding the update margin for low-probability high-advantage actions. This principled replacement for fixed PPO-style clipping improves exploration and robustly mitigates entropy collapse across LLM reinforcement learning settings.
2025.11
Policy Optimization
Soft Adaptive Policy Optimization
This paper introduces Soft Adaptive Policy Optimization (SAPO), replacing hard clipping in group-based LLM reinforcement learning with a temperature-controlled soft gate that continuously attenuates off-policy token updates. Its sequence-coherent, token-adaptive objective improves training stability, sample efficiency, and reasoning performance across text and Qwen3-VL models.
2025.07
Policy Optimization
Group Sequence Policy Optimization
This paper introduces GSPO, a reinforcement learning algorithm for LLMs that replaces token-level importance ratios with sequence-level likelihood ratios and performs sequence-level clipping, rewarding, and optimization. GSPO improves training efficiency and performance over GRPO, stabilizes MoE RL training, and helps simplify large-scale RL infrastructure for Qwen3 models.
2025.03
Policy Optimization
DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scale
This paper introduces Decoupled Clip and Dynamic Sampling Policy Optimization (DAPO), an open large-scale reinforcement learning system for eliciting LLM reasoning. It releases the training recipe, code, dataset, and model weights, reaching 50 points on AIME 2024 with Qwen2.5-32B and improving reproducibility for large-scale LLM RL.
2024.05
Policy Optimization
Provably Mitigating Overoptimization in RLHF: Your SFT Loss is Implicitly an Adversarial Regularizer
This paper identifies RLHF overoptimization as a consequence of distribution shift and uncertainty in learned preferences, then introduces Regularized Preference Optimization (RPO), which combines a preference optimization objective with an SFT loss that acts as an adversarial regularizer. RPO provides finite-sample guarantees and empirically improves alignment over DPO while reducing drift toward undesired responses.
2024.02
Policy Optimization
KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization
This paper frames successful LLM alignment losses as human-aware losses that encode biases from prospect theory, then introduces KTO to optimize generation utility directly from binary desirable/undesirable feedback. KTO matches or exceeds preference-pair methods from 1B to 30B scales, highlighting how the best alignment loss depends on the setting's inductive biases.
2023.05
Policy Optimization
Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model
This paper introduces Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), which reparameterizes the RLHF reward model so the optimal policy can be learned directly from preference data with a simple classification loss. DPO removes separate reward-model fitting and online reinforcement learning while matching or improving PPO-based RLHF with simpler, more stable training.
2017.07
Policy Optimization
Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms
This paper introduces Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), a family of policy-gradient methods that alternates environment sampling with multiple minibatch epochs on a surrogate objective. PPO retains key trust-region benefits while being simpler to implement and empirically balancing sample efficiency, performance, and wall-clock time.